Resource Times:

Date / Time: 06/24/04 14:37:10


See the solver return definitions for optimal/feasible model and solve statuses. Solutions are not checked for how close they are to eachother. Resource times are considered the same, if they are within 10% of eachother. A solver is considered faster than another, if it is less than 50% faster than the other. A solver is considered much faster than another, if it is more than 50% faster than the other.

If a model was not solved optimal/feasible by both solvers, the resource time is considered the same. If a model was solved optimal/feasible by solver A but not by solver B, then solver A is considered infinitely faster than solver B. Similarly, if one solver has trace data and the other has no data, then the first solver is consideredinfinitely faster.

A solver is considered to have a better objective function value, if the relative objective value difference is greater than 1.00E-05 For objective values below 1e-1 we use absolute differences.

Tracefile 1 :1-cops_ipopt_conopt3.trc
Tracefile 2 :4-cops_ipopt_snopt.trc
Solvers used : CONOPT3
SNOPT
Modeltype(s)   NLP
Threshold: Solver Faster 10%
Threshold: Solver Much Faster 50%
Threshold: Solver Infinitely Faster Other solver failed


Total Obj CONOPT3 better Obj same Obj SNOPT better
Solver CONOPT3 infinitely faster : 1 1 - -
Solver CONOPT3 much faster : 15 2 13 -
Solver CONOPT3 faster : 3 1 2 -
Solvers perform the same :- - - -
Solver SNOPT faster :- - - -
Solver SNOPT much faster :- - - -
Solver SNOPT infinitely faster : 2 - - 2
Both solvers failed to solve optimally :- - - -
Total models: : 214152




Solver return definition:

OutcomeModel StatusSolver Status
globally optimal 1 or 15 1
locally optimal/feasible 2 or 7 or 16 or 17 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 or 5




Resource Times:

Back to top

Solver CONOPT3 infinitely faster - Obj of CONOPT3 better:

Modelname Time (CONOPT3) Time (SNOPT) Ratio (CONOPT3 / SNOPT) Obj (CONOPT3) Obj (SNOPT)
jbearing100 9.7400fail -- -1.55041962E-01 0.00000000E+00

Back to top



Back to top

Solver CONOPT3 much faster - Obj of CONOPT3 better:

Modelname Time (CONOPT3) Time (SNOPT) Ratio (CONOPT3 / SNOPT) Obj (CONOPT3) Obj (SNOPT)
catmix800 6.250045.80120.136 -4.80558474E-02 -4.76966541E-02
jbearing75 6.11003600.36210.002 -1.54984535E-01 -1.11652672E-01

Back to top



Back to top

Solver CONOPT3 much faster - Obj same for both solvers:

Modelname Time (CONOPT3) Time (SNOPT) Ratio (CONOPT3 / SNOPT) Obj (CONOPT3) Obj (SNOPT)
gasoil100 2.400011.40820.210 5.23659431E-03 5.23659432E-03
gasoil200 5.360051.21040.105 5.23659587E-03 5.23659587E-03
gasoil50 1.20004.00920.299 5.23664002E-03 5.23664002E-03
jbearing25 3.66001682.66030.002 -1.54824222E-01 -1.54824219E-01
jbearing50 3.71001676.30900.002 -1.54824222E-01 -1.54824219E-01
lnts200 3.130012.08090.259 5.54577015E-01 5.54577193E-01
lnts400 16.160040.03310.404 5.54572414E-01 5.54572600E-01
methanol200 6.160066.16940.093 9.02228976E-03 9.02229230E-03
methanol400 12.2900231.15820.053 9.02228985E-03 9.02228997E-03
pinene200 11.0600133.12180.083 1.98721649E+01 1.98721668E+01
torsion25 2.840026.73920.106 -4.17510730E-01 -4.17510726E-01
torsion50 5.7100370.47440.015 -4.18087632E-01 -4.18087609E-01
torsion75 10.21001614.06680.006 -4.18199401E-01 -4.18199387E-01

Back to top



Back to top

Solver CONOPT3 faster - Obj of CONOPT3 better:

Modelname Time (CONOPT3) Time (SNOPT) Ratio (CONOPT3 / SNOPT) Obj (CONOPT3) Obj (SNOPT)
camshape800 5.830010.48300.556 -4.27427414E+00 -4.26882831E+00

Back to top



Back to top

Solver CONOPT3 faster - Obj same for both solvers:

Modelname Time (CONOPT3) Time (SNOPT) Ratio (CONOPT3 / SNOPT) Obj (CONOPT3) Obj (SNOPT)
lnts100 2.13002.98240.714 5.54595401E-01 5.54596158E-01
lnts50 0.56000.89850.623 5.54668765E-01 5.54668769E-01

Back to top



Back to top

Solver SNOPT infinitely faster - Obj of SNOPT better:

Modelname Time (CONOPT3) Time (SNOPT) Ratio (CONOPT3 / SNOPT) Obj (CONOPT3) Obj (SNOPT)
popdynm50 infeasible 12.5029 -- 3.16227766E+07 1.97465452E+07
rocket200 fail 21.3875 -- -1.00912729E+00 -1.01267680E+00

Back to top